future

Lift interviews

A few days after the end of Lift09, here is a first video which is actually a condensed of the short interview we made.

Only one question: "Where did the future go?"

And the answer from Nicolas Nova, Fabio Sergio, Daniel Kaplan, Remy Bourganel, Charles Nepote, Juliana Rotich and 5 other people we're missing the name so please don't hesitate and add it in a comment.

Lift Interviews - Where did the future go? from Axel Morales on Vimeo.

Thanks to all those who played the game.

Other videos are coming .... soon.


Future 0.9b

As a designer I’ve found really interesting the discussion about the role of designers in creating a vision of the future. Yesterday Patrick Gyger affirmed that we don’t have anymore a vision of the future, because we think we are living it. Indeed it is difficult to imagine the future, to predict it.

Matt Webb highlights how designers play an important role in reflecting and experimenting around the evolution of a product, of a service, of a system. But what are the tools in hand of designers to do that? Anab Jain invites us to play with tomorrow creating speculative scenarios of possible near future. The visionary “Metromatics 21th century” scenario of Frank Beau or the “Carnivore domestic entertainment robots” shown by James Auger are examples of this kind of practice.
To imagine the future we also need to know what didn’t work in the past. Nicolas Nova suggests a design strategy based on failure. We need to spot and document failures in order to not repeat them one more time. Some designers look at the prototype as a tool of conception, that leads to a more empirical design method based errors observation and progressive adjustments. Fabio Sergio believes that technology can actually be a material to sketch with. In this context the present becomes a sort of beta-version of the future we want to live in. In the picture above you can see an early prototype of a project where I tried to use a real plant as a computer input device.

So, let’s start to sketch our idea and let it grow. What we need is just a mixture of rationality and passion, of pragmatism and fantasy.


Looking back in order to better look forward

During the first intervention of this year LIFT conference, Patrick J. Gyger remarked that in the middle of the last century we were told that sci-fi literature was “extravagant fiction today cold fact tomorrow”. But if we look back at that time we can easily notice that the image of the future was more a kind of style, a leitmotif, rather than a real prediction. Examples of this stylish future are the bizarre architecture, glamour cities, flying cars.

Actually now we are living in the future of our grandparents. But the future seems to have taken a different form. Of course we’re still missing invisibility and tele-trasportation, but some of the concepts are here even if most of them have been realized without reaching their goals. That’s what Nicolas Nova calls “failures of Holy Grails”, inventions and products that didn’t success because of different reason: the technology wasn’t ready, they didn’t answer to any real need. For instance, the myth of the flying car inspired a lot of concepts like the “Airphibina” (1946) or the “Aerocar” (1949). They all failed because people didn’t really need a flying car. They just “wanted to dream about them”. Therefore in 2009 we can still see amazing old FIAT 500 running in the street instead of the flying taxi of “The fifth elemet”.

However, in Gyger’s opinion, today we’re living both the dreams and the nightmare of our grandparents. In one hand we’ve seen the dream of the tech-utopia become reality, we feel that we are living in THE future and we don’t dare too much to have a new visions of it. In the other hand we feel as living in dystopia, where technology is not longer a savior of humanity but rather the greatest threat, a danger to our private life.


One afternoon in utopia: the nomadic city

We had this workshop yesterday; about designing future hybrid cities, we all split into groups on different topics such as, “endless energy city”, “ ambient city”, etc.

I ended up in the nomadic city group, and so right now I guess you must be asking yourself but what is a nomadic city ??...well, actually defining this was kind of the point of this workshop...And so we had this long brainstorming with so many interesting but very abstract question, it started by understanding whether we were talking about people nomadism through the cities or the city being nomad itself.

But even once you’ve chosen one of those path, it’s absolutely not an answer, it’s more like a hundred more question and so the brainstorming went on and on and on and on and I‘ve got to tell that I haven’t been focused from the beginning to the end.

What I know is that people had different conception of what makes a city, for some people it was about infrastructure moving through space and / or time, without border, this can basically be shop or other stuff with very short temporality ( imagine that every single shops , restaurants, institutions changed every month, continuously, how could you feel the belonging to a city, wouldn’t that be some kind of nomadism? The extreme example of that are some huge festival like The Burning Man, where a city emerge in a few days and disappears few days later.


Speaker Profile: Clive van Heerden

Clive van Heerden is creative director of Philips ‘Design Probes’ program. The projects he leads there include amongst others the exploration of electronic textiles for emotional sensing and expression as well as electronic tattoos that transform with touch.

Philips Design Probes is a dedicated ‘far-future’ research initiative to track trends and developments that may ultimately evolve into mainstream issues that have a significant impact on business. Emerging developments in five main areas are tracked - politics, economics, environment, technology and culture. The outcomes of this ‘far-future’ research are used to identify systemic shifts, with the aim of understanding ‘lifestyle’ post 2020. The main objective of this program is to stimulate the discussion and register feedback, challenging conventional ways of thinking to come up with concepts to stimulate debate.

On Friday afternoon, during the “New Frontiers” session, Clive will show us how to employ past technological failures to develop disruptive futures. For more information and to connect to Clive have a look at his LIFT page.


Speaker Profile: James Auger

James Auger is a partner in the critical design practice Auger-Loizeau whose projects explore the role of technology as a mediator and modifier of the human experience in both contemporary and future societies. Their work has been exhibited and published globally over the past 8 years. He teaches on the Design Interactions course at the Royal College of Art in London and is currently undertaking a design practice based PhD looking into the role of robots in the home environment.

On their explorations into design for the near future they explored technology’s effect on human culture, behaviour and experience. A tooth implant that transmits sounds over the jaw-bone, a phone that blocks all other peripheral sensory distraction or several prototypes to augment animals are just some of the examples.

During the “Design thinking for the future” session on Friday, James will talk to us about the role designers can play in shaping our technological future. Find more info on James on his LIFT page or discover his projects on his website.


Speaker Profile: Patrick Gyger

Patrick J. Gyger is a Swiss historian, curator and writer. In the 1990s he specialised in medieval studies. Since 1999, he has been the director of Maison d’Ailleurs (the “House of Elsewhere”), a Swiss museum.

With it’s over 60,000 books and thousands of pulp magazines it houses one of the world’s largest collections of literature on science fiction, utopia, and extraordinary journeys.

In 2008, Patrick opened the “Espace Jules Verne”, a wing of Maison d’Ailleurs dedicated to Jules Verne and extraordinary journeys. In the early 2000s, he was one of the co-managers of European Space Agency’s ITSF study – Innovative Technologies from Science Fiction for Space Applications – a research looking into Science Fiction to find ideas for space engineers. His most recent book is “Flying Cars or, Memories of a Dreamt Future”.

Patrick, together with Nicolas Nova, will kick off the conference on Thursday morning with his talk in the first “Change” session. We are very much looking forward to his talk on “Memoires of a magnificent future”. Find more info on Patrick on his LIFT profile.


Speaker Profile: Jörg Jelden

Jörg Jelden is a senior trend analyst at Trendbuero – Consultancy for Social Change, in Hamburg and Beijing. His main field of interest is centered around Network Economy: How will the rise of the internet change our society? How will consumer behavior change? How will we do business tomorrow? What will be new business models to answer the changes?

Together with Prof. Peter Wippermann he produces the Trend Day. Every year in May 600 decision makers come together to discuss the most important topics with international acclaimed speakers like Muhammad Yunus, Richard Florida, Daniel Nissanoff, Howard Rheingold, Jimmy Wales etc. In cooperation with Interone Worldwide Joerg established InsightBench, a semantic research tool to analyse digitally published opinions and texts.

During his stay at Trendbuero´s Asia-Pacific office in Beijing Joerg examined The Future of Fake. He tried to find out, why fakes are so succesful, what they do differently and what brands can learn from the fake industry. This will also be the topic of his talk during the Stories session on Friday morning. Sounds interesting? Learn more about him on his LIFT page or on Trendbuero.


Speaker Profile: Frank Beau

Frank is a researcher and independent consultant specialized on new media. He currently works with the RATP, the Parisian Transport Operator, on the future of the subway. He will be speaking on love in the 21st century, more specifically about “metromantics”: internet messages about romantic encounters in Paris’ metro.

Why LIFT
It’ll be Frank’s first LIFT conference. Having only heard and read about the conference until now he still gave us a wonderful, detailed answer of what he believes LIFT stands for. He feels that a space, where people from all over the world get together to open-mindedly reflect and discuss technology and society is much needed. In the face of the challenges of our time: what can technology, the technologos, do for us and what does it do to us?

Listen in: “We’ve got googleface-tube-iphone-engine-maps-earth-streetviewer-socialgraphs-gps and an enormous amount of real time data about cities-friends-neighboors-theothersideoftheworld in our fingers, on the same screen. And so? And then? Why are so much people feeling so lonely in our cities, what can the Internet do for the housing crisis, or worse … for feeding people? Is it crazy to wait for technology to solve that, and to think that it’s only a question of time with the Internet as the next miracle of the happy global village? The Internet is only a camera. And its power lies more in what this new camera-micro-and-macroscope can bring to light about our non-changing way of life and beings than about the power of radical modernity. So, by discovering the naked world through the eyes of technology, what could we do?”

What Frank expects
Frank would like to share with fellow LIFTers, participate in a gathering that goes beyond technology, assist in the creation of a “campfire of exchanges”.


A look at 2008, the "boring" year ahead

In the LIFT08 opening keynote, science fiction writer Bruce Sterling looked in his rear mirror to see the near future, and predicts a boring 2008.


Speaker: 
Bruce Sterling
Moderator: 
Laurent Haug
More information
Date: 
7 Feb 2008

What's the punchiest possible thing you could say about the past year? And I'm like. That's the way it was, now get after it. As per predicting the future - something I've been known to do in the past - the basic reason to do that is motivational, it's moral boosting. The main reason people prosper is because they're willing to get out of bed. Showing up is 90% of the job, really. It's hardly ever because they have some kind of brilliant, lucid, accurate idea of what the year holds for them. That just does not happen. Showing up, persisting, doing it, going up out of bed, that's what really counts.

What you want to be told by futurists are things that help you get up in the morning, like why this is gonna be a crucial year, these are really revolutionary times, everything hinges on the decisions that we make this month, only the bold deserve the fares, great fortunes are waiting and so forth. And I know how to do that. Really. Cause I've seen it done maybe a hundred times.

But this is a Lift audience, this is not the Silicon Valley, there are Europeans here. European being people who have a sense of historical continuity, actually see a little farther than just like last year, just next year, and really, frankly, for all kind of obvious reasons, 2008 is not gonna be a pivotal, revolutionary year. It's not impossible that something really important happens in 2008, but really, that's just not very plausible.

It's a crap year, 2008.

We got this economic downturn waiting, everybody knows it's coming. [...] It's election year in the US, they will be extremely preoccupied. China is having an Olympic which is nice, then they're gonna be doing at least some of their incredible heaps of dirty laundry in 2008. India is doing great but they are completely surrounded by crazy Mujaheddin lunatics, they kind of have their hands full. And Europe is kind of doing pretty well, but Europe tends to do things slowly. I mean surely but slowly. Like a vast European python that eats five, or ten countries at a time, and then digests them. Slowly but surely. The worst problem that Europe has now - global warming - is like a 200 years old problem. It's a slow problem, it's a problem that we can say with great certainty our grand children will worry about. It's not gonna be solved in 2008. That is not an issue, global warming is a way of life.

Even in the tech world which I love for it's fast paced, it's bull, it's recklessness, is it really exciting to watch Microsoft eat Yahoo? Is there anybody, even inside Yahoo or Microsoft, who really thinks that's the way forward? Is that an innovation? It's not an innovation, that is a profoundly retrograde moving, that's an aging monopoly shoring up it's position by feeding on the week. Microsoft is boring. Gates left it was so boring. Gates would rather cure Malaria - which is 15 different kinds of impossible - rather than pretend that Microsoft is the road ahead. It's that bad.

Given that these are the facts on the ground, and they are, I wanted to offer you something that was really focused and specific, a piece of futuristic prophecy, a flat out prediction, facts and figures that I'm sure that as Europeans you can use in 2008. Something that you can take from Lift and that will give you a valuable insight and genuinely brighten your life. Really punchy, focused, so let me explain to you how you can deal with a phenomena that you are certain to be confronting during the entirety of 2008. It is something that came out of nowhere, and it achieved fantastic press attention. It is defining the very character of our times, especially in Europe, and you have already seen a lot of it, more than you ever wanted to see, more than you expected to see, and you're going to see more, and more, and more of it. And it's a practical certainty that you will see it, and if you're not prepared for this, if you don't have the proper analytical tools, you will be overwhelmed by it, confused, sickened, bewildered.

Whereas if you do understand what's going on, with an ability to anticipate developments there, you will be like an American that has been taught the rules of soccer. You'll probably still won't like it very much, but you'll understand why it matters to people, and you'll be able to put it in useful perspective, and get on with your life. And as I'm sure, you've guessed, I am referring to Carla Bruni. Madame Carla Sarkozy, the first lady of France. And you may ask why I bring up her name and her career - I mean exciting career - at a tech conference like Lift. That's because Carla Bruni has become the first lady of France because of a tech conference. First time that Carla Bruni ever met Nicolas Sarkozy was at a little tech summit that the president of France threw for the recording artists. President Sarkozy does not like to see French artists suffer from piracy loses, and he's especially irritated by internet zealots who declare that French music ought to be free when he knows that somebody somewhere is paying for it.

So president Sarkozy therefore has created a policy to civilize the internet, civilize the internet from a French perspective, and the first order of operation in his plan is to repress peer to peer networks on French soil. And since artists, like Carla, and copyright holders, like Carla, and backbone operators - which Carla is not yet - they all hate p2p networks and p2p networks gave a dime to president's Sarkozy campaign or anybody else. His scheme is to make himself the European equivalent of Steve Jobs.

So Monsieur et Madame Sarkozy are the products of an Internet policy romance. Carla isn't here at Lift, Carla has a whole lot of reasons to be here at Lift. Carla Sarkozy is what futurists refer to as a black swan. A black swan is a historical event which is significant and important, but so far fetched that it's unpredictable even in principle. The attack on the world trade center was a black swan. Even if you know that Al Quaeda does not like crusaders, there was no sensible way to anticipate that. Similarly even if you know that politicians often have girlfriends, you can not know that one is suddenly going to become the Madame Dubarry of a French digital renaissance. But you know, black swans can be good as well as bad. Swans are beautiful creatures. And Carla Sarkozy is gorgeous. She's a transnational European aristocrat who loves poetry, music and philosophy.

Sarkozy is like a politician who got a sour lemon, and then made some lemonade, and then he married the heiress of an entire italian lemon orchard. Carla took a bad situation - no Madame Sarkozy - and she turned it into a situation where there is a Madame Sarkozy who is extremely weird. With Carla on board he has more lemons than you and I can ever imagine, he's like a lemon mogul. And it's not like this was some pre-calculated master scheme, because no man that has been thunderstruck by Carla Bruni is ever in command of events. But he has multiplied his options radically. Cecilia bitterly resonated, just because he sent her alone into a hostile, terrorist country to rescue some hostages, which she did. Whereas Carla by contrast, is clearly capable of anything. She's a charismatic, poetic, wealthy, sophisticated, profoundly promiscuous European aristocrat who is completely untroubled by bourgeois morality.

Now a story like that practically writes itself. There isn't one journalist in this world who can't write a Carla Sarkozy story in his or her sleep, which is why you will certainly be inundated by recurring title waves of Carla Bruni stories. In Europe in 2008 these are two adventurers, radicals, a decadent aristocrat married to a self made man and now they're in power. They're simply the most interesting story there is. Ok, that given. And it is given. Because you don't get any choice about a black swan.

How does one get over this? This calls for some futurist scenarios. So let's delimit the possibilities, shall we. What really matters in this situation? What are the two most important driving forces? I'd say there are 2: ambition and publicity. We got one axis which is ambition - Carla's ambition - because a politicians is always ambitious. It's a given, not a variable.

The other axis is publicity. Carla and president Sarkozy are notorious. They can not possibly turn the publicity faucet off. That is not within their power. But they can turn the faucet up. They can not make the press go away, they can feed it. And they have already both done that repeatedly and skillfully, either together or apart so we know this matters to them. So for these two axis we can form a quadrant of future possibilities, the four possible future worlds in 2008 of Monsieur et Madame Sarkozy.

They are four combinations. Low ambition high publicity. Low ambition low publicity. High ambition low publicity. And the last possibility, high ambition and high publicity. That's all the two of them can do, they can do bold things loudly or bold things quietly, or mild things loudly, or mild things quietly. When they are in bed together, talking about their strategy, weeping, chuckling, consoling each other, whatever newly weds do, that's pretty it.

So what will happen in 2008? Well we can not guess this, but we can describe it. First scenario: low ambition and low publicity. This is the "ends in tears" scenario. Carla has never been married before, she's certainly never been a politician's wife, that's boring. The forces of conventionality overwhelm her. It's just too much for her. She retreats from the public scene. She's in depression, Cecilia was right about everything, Nicolas is too much for any woman to handle. He's full of himself, he's burning her out, the manic romance switched over to a depression. Divorce looms. They try not to say anything about it. Another public divorce would be unthinkable. They go to earth, they really try to hide. It has ended in tears.

Scenario number two. High publicity, low ambition. We can call this one the "first diva of France" scenario. Carla is happy to be the first lady of France, it's a big honor. Respectability goes to her head. Meetings at the UN, the G7, [...] she's in Vogue, and womens wear daily, but never in the Economist or the New York Times. She records a new pop album, it sells pretty well, French population becomes proud of her, they don't call her the Italian eyed green witch anymore. The first lady is pretty and talented, she's a patroness of culture, she makes all the other first ladies of countries look like potato sacks. What French citizen can't like that prospect? It has turned out pretty well as far as the population of France is concerned. The first diva of France scenario. So now, scenario number three.

Low publicity, high ambition. We can call this one the "power behind the throne" scenario. Carla Sarkozy has had a taste for famous men, famous men in power, now she's finally gotten one at the very top of the heap. She only became a pop musician because she was bored. She was the mistress of musicians and she saw how easy it was to lead that life. The Bruni-Teddeschi family though are aristocrats, and they are not feeble in bread weak aristocrats, they are European industrial aristocrats. People with factories. People who make rubber tires, Carla is already richer than Sarkozy is, she's six times richer than Sarkozy.

Carla wants to make industrial policy. That was why she courted Sarkozy in the first place. He's a jittery, hyperactive politician, in need of an intimate counselor he will trust for that question. There will be his years as president, then he retires and take over the CEO of a major league recording company, then they really cash in. They are Carla incorporated, they are Carla Sarl. Maybe a baby while she's first lady. Then they'll have an industrial dynasty! The power behind the throne scenario.

And then the final scenario. High publicity, high ambition. They say than in any proper set of four futurist scenarios, there are three that are the Goldy Locks versions, you know that fairy tale, Goldy Locks and the three bears, it's like three bowls of porridge, one is too hot, one is too cold, then one bowl of porridge is just right. So there are commonly four futurist scenarios, one is too cold, one is too hot, and one is just right. And then there is the fourth one. The weird one. And the weird one is commonly the most useful scenario, because the future tends to be weird.

High publicity, high ambition is the weird scenario. We'll call this scenario "empress of Europe". Nicolas is busy making his friend Tony Blair into the first president of Europe right now, not because he really likes Tony. Tony is a british leftist, and he speaks terrible French. But because Nicolas himself expects to have that job someday, after Tony Blair has turned that empty post into a real job with some power, then Sarkozy can become president of Europe. Tony is a gentleman, he will get out of the way, and as the kingmaker for the previous incumbent, not to mention being president of France, Sarkozy has a rather good shot at this job.

Now the last French leader who survived a divorce in office was emperor Napoleon. And if you were a student of French history, you might know that the outlines of contemporary Europe are similar to those of Napoleon's empire at its greatest extent. As the emperor took too many risks, it ended in silence and exile for him, but at least he abolished the holy roman empire and invented code Napoleon and rid Europe of a lot of annoying mediaeval clutter, which is clearly what Nicolas Sarkozy wants to do. They call him the "bling bling president". The emperor Napoleon did not exactly lack for bling bling.

Glamour has its uses. Glamour can be a weapon. On the field of battle the morale is to the material as three is to one. So in this scenario we see things coming out of imperial Europe, 21st century Europe, that we haven't seen coming out of Europe for maybe 2 or 300 years. We see world sweeping, aggressive Carla Sarkozy charm offenses. She's a pop star with the power of a state behind her, she's bigger than Bono, she's bigger than the Rolling Stones. The two of them have cooked up a weird media art and culture intervention which is meant to wake the French population from its slumbers.

When Sarkozy says that he wants to lead a French renaissance, he's in his deadly earnest. And since it can not be military, since it can not be economic, it's pretty much got to be political and cultural. They are living in a hurricane of madness as Carla puts it her poetic way. And they are methodically steering the hurricane. This star couple's intent is not only to conquer France, that would be too easy. Everybody else thinks the publicity firestorm will embarrass them, that they will have to sit down and shut up and stop bothering peop le with tabloid headlines but no. In the empress of Europe scenario the fire-born are at home in fire. A supermodel and a statesman can never get enough publicity, or enough power. They conquer France and they plan their assault on Europe, and you'll be lucky if they stop there.

So, now we have our four future worlds. You don't have to feel surprised or offended by this advent any longer. It's not like you can predict the future. Carla and Nicolas, I promise you, they don't know the future any better than you do. But it has become a spectator sport. You can amuse yourself by placing out odds on those different scenarios, and now I myself will judge it this way.

Ends in tears: 40% probability
First diva of France: 15% of probability.
Power behind the throne: 10%.
And Empress of Europe I would give a whopping, optimistic, caffeinated 35%. Because I'm a journalist, and although I know that fairier is always most likely, fantastic success is a much better story. There are those who claim the two of them have already gone too far. The muslim are offended, the hindus are offended, the pope was offended, elderly French catholics are offended by their behavior. Even for the British royal family who are not exactly noted for propriety, their romantic behavior seems a little at sea. Who can not cheer on a couple who can do all that?

If they get away with this, an entire generation of politicians around Europe will be liberated to have the same personal life all the rest of us do. In the 21st century they are not any major political figure who actually observes any victorian sexual propriety. They just cynically exploit sexual values, politics as a weapon against the population and against each other. You can ask any alluded gay in the republican party how well that kind works. That kind of tactics works but it's evil. Bad for us.

Now I would not want to claim that Carla and Sarkozy are all that happens in 2008, even if they make themselves big news in that year. I can guarantee you that Carla has won herself a place in the history books. In 2028, journalists, historians will say "Carla Bruni" and people will say "wow, that sounds so early 21st century".

Carla Bruni is not the only black swan that graces our world. The internet was a black swan too. In her younger days, internet, taken the street, has gotten pretty big. Big enough that Carla and Nicolas go to it. And they found each other there. And they get married. Instead of the industry going to Nicolas and Carla to politely ask them for political favors and some cultural content, the internet does not need political favors now, because it can make or break politicians. And it is full of content, most of it swiped or involuntary shared from the likes of Carla Bruni.

Now I don't have time up here to run a similar futuristic scenario about the internet's adventures in 2008, but I can tell you stories. Really. I can tell you stories about the future. When you have a good story about futurity you can smell it. You can smell taking on shape. You never guess the details - you never can - bvut you can smell the futurity coming through. Boy that will get you out of bed in the morning, it's like coffee and bacon in another room.

90% of success, the way to survive this next year or any year, showing up when you succeed in reaching the future, it means than you survived long enough to see it. You survived long enough to become it. As a human being you can become the future, you can embody it. You can live it, and the future can be guessed at. But life is best enjoyed. So enjoy your conference ladies and gentlemen, thank you for having me.


Syndicate content